Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is just a bit better than Motorola One Vision's 80.7 general score. Even when the Galaxy A51 and Motorola One Vision were only released with a few months difference, the Galaxy A51 is a little lighter and a bit thinner. Motorola One Vision has a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2520px resolution and a bit higher display density.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a bit better processor than Motorola One Vision. They have a Octa-Core processor and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Motorola One Vision and the Samsung Galaxy A51 feature really similar memory for games and applications, both have a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB and the same internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A51 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 14 percent greater battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a camera that's just as good as Motorola One Vision's camera, and although the Samsung Galaxy A51 has a tinier aperture which is worse for taking photographs and video in poorly lited environments, they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same video frame rates, a same resolution back camera and a 0.5 inches sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.