Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-05-15 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is much better than the Motorola One Vision, getting a 90.7 score against 80.7. Samsung Galaxy A52's design is newer and a little bit thinner, but just a bit heavier than the Motorola One Vision. The Galaxy A52 features a little better processing power than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A52 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2520px resolution and a little bit better display density. The Galaxy A52 features a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A52 also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 has a bit better camera than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution back camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Galaxy A52 counts with better battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 29% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.