Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is better than Motorola One Vision's score of 80.7. Galaxy A52 5G is a newer and a bit thinner device than the Motorola One Vision, although it's also just a little heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
Motorola One Vision counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 and a just a little more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor and a way higher resolution camera.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G has longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 29% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.