Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Prism bricks black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is better than the Motorola One Vision, having a general score of 92.9 against 80.7. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's construction is newer and just a little bit thinner, but just a bit heavier than the Motorola One Vision. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a bit better performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM memory.
Motorola One Vision has a little sharper screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better display pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels. Galaxy A71 5G UW takes a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a back camera with a way higher resolution and a larger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a bit more storage to install applications and games than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has superior battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.