Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-05-15 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is slightly better than the Motorola One Vision, getting a general score of 85.2 against 80.7. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) design is a little bit thinner but just a bit heavier than the Motorola One Vision, and they were released with only 6 months difference. Motorola One Vision has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a same size display, the Motorola One Vision also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 and a bit better display density.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a bit better CPU than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy A9 (2018) has as much memory capacity to install applications and games as the Motorola One Vision one, both have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB and exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has 3800mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola One Vision has a much better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same video frame rate, a same size aperture and the same video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also has a much bigger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and a camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.