Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is better than the Motorola One Vision, having a 90.8 score against 80.7. Even though the Galaxy Note 20 is a little heavier than the Motorola One Vision, it's a little thinner and newer. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM memory.
Motorola One Vision has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher quantity of pixels in each inch of screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2520px. The Motorola One Vision takes clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola One Vision also counts with better 30 fps video frame rate, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and video and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The Motorola One Vision has a much better memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Motorola One Vision also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with improved battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 23% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.