Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is a bit better than Motorola One Vision, getting a general score of 81.2 against 80.7. The Galaxy Note 3 is an a lot older device than the Motorola One Vision, but it is a bit lighter and a bit thinner anyway. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a little more vivid display than Motorola One Vision, although it has a bit smaller display, a quite lower 1920 x 1080px resolution and a quite lower pixel quantity per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a little faster processor than Motorola One Vision, because although it has an inferior number of cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The Motorola One Vision has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also has a much larger camera aperture to take better low light photos, a much larger sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a way more megapixels camera.
Motorola One Vision has a superior memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Motorola One Vision features a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 9 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.