Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision has a global score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5's global score of 79.3. Even though Motorola One Vision is newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, it is just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker. The Galaxy Note 5 counts with a more vivid display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density and a slightly better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Motorola One Vision features a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola One Vision also has a larger number of cores (and they are faster). The Motorola One Vision counts with a better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also has a bigger camera aperture to take better images and video in low light environments, a back facing camera with a much better resolution and a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Motorola One Vision features a much better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Motorola One Vision features just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.