Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-05-15 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is slightly better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with an 80.7 score against 80.4. Motorola One Vision is a newer cellphone than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it is just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little bit better looking display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a little bit higher pixels density.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features just a bit better performance than Motorola One Vision. They have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM memory amount. Motorola One Vision shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a same size camera aperture, the Motorola One Vision also has a bigger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs and a lot better resolution back camera.
Motorola One Vision has a much greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Motorola One Vision features a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.