Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-05-15 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is better than the Motorola One Vision's global score of 80.7. Galaxy Note10's design is a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner than Motorola One Vision, even when they were only released 3 months apart. Galaxy Note10 has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola One Vision features a bit better screen than Galaxy Note10, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola One Vision also has a slightly better 1080 x 2520 resolution and a quite better pixels count per screen inch. The Motorola One Vision has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light captures and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a way higher 48 MP resolution camera and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note10, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note10's battery lifetime is very similar to Motorola One Vision's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.