Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-05-15 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision has a score of 80.7, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note7's 79.5 overall score. Even though the Motorola One Vision is notably newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note7, it's just a little thicker and just a bit heavier. Motorola One Vision has a bit superior processor than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola One Vision also has a larger number of cores (and faster).
The Galaxy Note7 counts with a slightly better looking display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a just a little better screen pixels density. The Motorola One Vision has much more memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note7, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola One Vision features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Vision also has a lot more mega-pixels camera and a larger sensor capturing better quality pictures and videos.
The Galaxy Note7 counts with a battery performance that is just as good as Motorola One Vision's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.