Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-15 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is slightly better than Motorola One Vision's score of 80.7. Even when Galaxy S10 and Motorola One Vision were released only 2 months apart, Galaxy S10 is just a little thinner and lighter. Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a little bit better looking display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a higher pixel count in each display inch.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 also has 4 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10 features as much storage capacity to store more apps and games as the Motorola One Vision, both have exactly the same internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola One Vision has a better camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and videos and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos and a camera with a way higher 48 MP resolution.
Motorola One Vision counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S10, because it has a 3% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.