Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-15 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is better than Motorola One Vision, having a 93.6 score against 80.7. The Galaxy S10 5G construction is just a little heavier but a bit thinner than the Motorola One Vision, and both of them were only released with a few months difference. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola One Vision, because it has a little bit larger screen, a quite higher pixels density and a better 1440 x 3040px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Motorola One Vision features a little bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with longer battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola One Vision shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.