Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-05-15 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Vision's 80.7 general score. The Galaxy S10e design is just a bit thinner and lighter than Motorola One Vision, even when both were released with only a couple months difference. Galaxy S10e features a little sharper screen than Motorola One Vision, although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a bit smaller display, they both have a better pixels quantity in each inch of screen.
Galaxy S10e has just a little better performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10e also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Motorola One Vision has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for taking images and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a much more megapixels camera.
Samsung Galaxy S10e's storage capacity for apps and games is just as good as Motorola One Vision's one, both of them have a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and the same internal memory capacity. Motorola One Vision has just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.