Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 is much better than Motorola One Vision, with a 94.8 score against 80.7. Samsung Galaxy S20's design is newer, just a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Motorola One Vision. The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200.
Galaxy S20 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola One Vision features a slightly better camera than Galaxy S20, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing worse quality photographs and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better photography and video in low-light environments, a lot higher 48 MP resolution back-facing camera and better video frame rate.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 has a bit superior battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.