Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is much better than Motorola One Vision, getting a 90.8 score against 80.7. Even though Galaxy S20 FE is a bit heavier than the Motorola One Vision, it's just a little thinner and also newer. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit better performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM.
The Galaxy S20 FE and Motorola One Vision both count with very similar screens, because although the Galaxy S20 FE has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a little worse screen density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. The Motorola One Vision counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a bigger aperture for better images and video in low light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has longer battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 29% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.