Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Motorola One Vision, with a 98 score against 80.7. Even though Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is newer than the Motorola One Vision, it's heavier and a little thicker. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola One Vision, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, a just a bit greater pixels count per display inch and a bit bigger display.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a better camera than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, and they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a way more megapixels back camera.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.