Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Motorola One Vision, having a global score of 95.4 against 80.7. Although the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot newer than the Motorola One Vision, it's extremely heavier and a bit thicker. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola One Vision, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088, a quite bigger screen and a bit better display pixel density.
The Motorola One Vision features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Vision also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit better processing unit than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much better video quality, a lot more MP camera in the back and a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.