Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-15 | -- |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, with an 80.7 score against 76. The Motorola One Vision design is lighter but just a bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE. Galaxy S24 FE features a much better looking display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a quite bigger screen.
The Motorola One Vision has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola One Vision also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola One Vision features a much more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has a much longer battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 34% larger battery capacity. The Motorola One Vision takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse 48 MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.