Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-15 | -- |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 6.35 ounces | -- |
| Blue and Brown | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is a bit better than Motorola One Vision, getting a overall score of 82.6 against 80.7. Galaxy S25's construction is noticeably thinner and a lot lighter than the Motorola One Vision. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a better looking display than Motorola One Vision, although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a bit less pixels per inch in the display and a quite smaller display.
The Motorola One Vision has a much better performing CPU than Galaxy S25, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy S25 counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality, a back camera with a better 50 mega-pixels resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Motorola One Vision counts with much more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S25, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Vision also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy S25 counts with a bit better battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 14% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.