Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-15 | -- |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 6.35 ounces | -- |
| Blue and Brown | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than Motorola One Vision, getting a 90.7 score against 80.7. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is way thinner and a lot lighter than Motorola One Vision. The Motorola One Vision has a much faster processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way better looking display than Motorola One Vision, because it has a quite larger display, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a little bit higher display pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a very superior camera than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a back camera with a much higher 200 mega pixels resolution, a way better video resolution and a lot larger sensor taking much higher quality photographs.
Motorola One Vision features a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much longer battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.