Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Blue and Red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision has a general score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's global score of 77.8. The Motorola One Vision design is way newer and just a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's, but it's somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processor.
Galaxy S5 Sport features a sharper display than Motorola One Vision, although it has a bit smaller screen, a just a bit worse pixels amount per inch of display and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution. Motorola One Vision features a much bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Motorola One Vision has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 25% larger battery capacity. The Motorola One Vision has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also has a much bigger back camera sensor, a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a way larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.