Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-05-15 | -- |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | -- |
| Blue and Brown | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 Active is slightly better than Motorola One Vision, having an 80.9 score against 80.7. Galaxy S6 Active's construction is extremely lighter but just a little thicker than Motorola One Vision. Galaxy S6 Active features a way better looking screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity in each screen inch and a slightly better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S6 Active counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a GPU and a 64-bits processor.
The Motorola One Vision has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Vision also has a back camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and a much bigger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a battery life that is just as good as Motorola One Vision's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.