Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-05-15 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision has an overall score of 80.7, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's overall score of 75.8. Motorola One Vision's construction is extremely newer, just a bit lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. Motorola One Vision counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola One Vision also has 4 more CPU cores.
Galaxy S7 Active features a sharper display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch of display. The Motorola One Vision features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola One Vision also has a camera with a way better 48 MP resolution.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a little longer battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.