Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-05-15 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has a score of 83.3, which is just a bit better than Motorola One Vision's overall score of 80.7. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy S9 is older than Motorola One Vision, it's construction is just a little bit lighter and a bit thinner. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a little more vivid display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy S9 features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision. They have the same RAM amount and 8 processing cores. The Motorola One Vision counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S9, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Motorola One Vision shoots better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a much bigger sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
The Motorola One Vision has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S9, because it has a 17% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.