Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is a bit better than Motorola One Vision, having a score of 88.5 against 80.7. The Galaxy Z Flip construction is newer and thinner, but also just a little heavier than Motorola One Vision. Galaxy Z Flip has a little more vivid display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a little bit bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM. Motorola One Vision counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a larger aperture to take better photos and videos in low light environments, a camera with a way better 48 megapixels resolution and a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Motorola One Vision features a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Motorola One Vision has just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.