Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a little bit better than the Motorola One Vision, having a general score of 85.6 against 80.7. Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a newer and noticeably thinner cellphone than the Motorola One Vision, but it is a little heavier. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit sharper screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2636px resolution.
Motorola One Vision counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Vision also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit superior processing unit than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Motorola One Vision counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 3500mAh battery size. The Motorola One Vision takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and video and a lot better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.