Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is much better than the Motorola One Vision's 80.7 score. Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a little bit heavier than the Motorola One Vision, it's thinner and also newer. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little worse pixel number per display inch, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a bit larger display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Motorola One Vision has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels, a way bigger back camera sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and videos.
The Motorola One Vision has slightly more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola One Vision counts with a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.