Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than the Motorola One Vision's overall score of 80.7. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot heavier than Motorola One Vision, it's a lot thinner and also newer. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2520 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixel density. The Motorola One Vision features a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with greater battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. Motorola One Vision shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a much more megapixels back camera and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.