Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the Motorola One Vision, getting a global score of 90.6 against 80.7. Galaxy Z Fold 3's design is noticeably newer and notably thinner than the Motorola One Vision's, but it is also heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2520, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen. Motorola One Vision features just a bit more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a way larger aperture to capture better low light photography and a lot more mega pixels back camera. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has improved battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.