Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Blasting black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is much better than Motorola One Vision, getting a global score of 90.1 against 80.7. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro design is newer than the Motorola One Vision's, but it is heavier and somewhat thicker. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola One Vision, because it has a quite larger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a just a bit greater pixels density. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a little bit better camera than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a bigger back camera sensor which provides a higher image and video quality.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a bit more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.