Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-15 | 2016-11-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision has an overall score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2's 76 score. The Motorola One Vision body is newer than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2's, but it is thicker and just a little heavier. Motorola One Vision counts with a little better performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
Motorola One Vision features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2520 resolution, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a bit larger screen. Motorola One Vision features a very superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Vision also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Motorola One Vision takes a lot better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Vision also has a camera in the back with a lot better resolution, a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and video and a way bigger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures.
Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has superior battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 4070mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.