Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, getting an 80.7 score against 79. Motorola One Vision is an older phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, but Motorola made it somewhat lighter and a little thinner anyway. Motorola One Vision has a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520px.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola One Vision. Both have 8 processing cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's camera is just as good as the Motorola One Vision one, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photos and video, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a same size sensor, a same resolution back camera and the same (4K) video quality.
The Motorola One Vision has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Motorola One Vision also has more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a way better battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 43% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.