Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2019-09-05 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is slightly better than the Motorola One Zoom, getting a general score of 82 against 80. Apple iPhone XR is an older and just a little heavier phone than the Motorola One Zoom, but Apple managed to make it a little thinner anyway. IPhone XR has a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Zoom, although it has a just a bit lower pixel number in each display inch, a little bit smaller display and a lot worse resolution of 828 x 1792.
The iPhone XR has a better CPU than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. Motorola One Zoom has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than iPhone XR, because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Motorola One Zoom has superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola One Zoom has a much better camera than iPhone XR, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a larger aperture to capture better images in low-light situations, a much bigger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and a camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola One Zoom, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One Zoom. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola One Zoom, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.