Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-09-05 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel is just a bit better than the Motorola One Zoom, having an 80.2 score against 80. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel is incredibly older than the Motorola One Zoom, it's construction is a bit thinner and incredibly lighter. Motorola One Zoom has a little better performance than Google Pixel, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Motorola One Zoom also has a larger number of cores.
Google Pixel has a little more vivid screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater number of pixels in each inch in the screen. The Motorola One Zoom takes better videos and photos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Zoom also has a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality, a bigger camera aperture and a much more MP camera.
Motorola One Zoom features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Motorola One Zoom also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB. The Motorola One Zoom features a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2770mAh.
The Google Pixel not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.