Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-09-05 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is a little bit better than Motorola One Zoom, getting an 82.5 score against 80. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 2 XL is older than Motorola One Zoom, it's design is a bit lighter and somewhat thinner. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a little more vivid screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a better count of pixels per display inch.
Motorola One Zoom features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola One Zoom also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 128 GB. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Zoom. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount.
Motorola One Zoom shoots better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola One Zoom also has a lot bigger back camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality, a larger camera aperture to capture better photography and video in low light environments and a way higher 48 MP resolution camera.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 2 XL is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.