Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-09-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom has an overall score of 80, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3's 80 overall score. Motorola One Zoom's body is newer, but thicker and a lot heavier than Google Pixel 3. The Google Pixel 3 features a little more vivid screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixel number per inch of screen.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a little faster processor than Motorola One Zoom. Both have 4 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores. Motorola One Zoom captures much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Zoom also has a much bigger sensor shooting way better quality photos and videos, a camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution and a larger aperture.
The Motorola One Zoom has a much greater memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 128 GB and more internal storage. Motorola One Zoom features a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 37% bigger battery size.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 3, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.