Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-09-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is a bit better than Motorola One Zoom, with a overall score of 80.7 against 80. The Google Pixel 3 XL design is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than the Motorola One Zoom, despite of the fact that it was released only 11 months before. Google Pixel 3 XL has just a little better performance than Motorola One Zoom. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a little more vivid display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel number in each inch of display and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution. Motorola One Zoom counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 128 GB and more internal memory.
Motorola One Zoom has a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3430mAh. The Motorola One Zoom shoots better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One Zoom also has a lot larger sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs, a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a larger aperture to take better images and video in low light situations.
The Google Pixel 3 XL not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.