Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-05 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL, getting a general score of 80 against 78.9. Even being the best in our current comparison, the Motorola One Zoom is an a bit thicker and somewhat heavier phone than the Google Pixel 3a XL. The Google Pixel 3a XL and Motorola One Zoom feature similar displays, although the Google Pixel 3a XL has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, a little smaller screen and a just a little worse pixels count in each display inch.
The Motorola One Zoom has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB. The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a processing unit that's just as good as Motorola One Zoom's processing unit, both have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola One Zoom takes better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Zoom also has a lot bigger sensor, a larger aperture and a lot better resolution back facing camera.
Motorola One Zoom features a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has an 8 percent greater battery size.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3a XL. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 3a XL, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.