Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-09-05 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is a little bit better than the Motorola One Zoom, getting a score of 82.9 against 80. The Google Pixel 4 XL body is a little bit thinner but just a little bit heavier than the Motorola One Zoom, and they were only released 2 months apart. Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit sharper display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040px resolution and a higher pixel density.
Motorola One Zoom has a much greater memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 128 GB. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Motorola One Zoom takes better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same video definition, the same diafragm aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola One Zoom also has a way bigger sensor and a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution.
Motorola One Zoom has a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an 8 percent larger battery size.
The Google Pixel 4 XL costs a little more money than the Motorola One Zoom, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.