Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 403 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom has an overall score of 80, which is a little bit better than HTC One M9's score of 77.7. Motorola One Zoom is a much newer and just a bit thinner phone than the HTC One M9, but it's also somewhat heavier. HTC One M9 counts with a more vivid display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher screen pixels density.
The HTC One M9 has just a bit better performance than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits CPU and an additional graphics co-processor. Motorola One Zoom counts with a much better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also has a larger sensor providing a higher image quality, a much larger aperture and a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, and although they both have a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB, the Motorola One Zoom also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a way better battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as HTC One M9. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Motorola One Zoom, otherwise you can save some money and get the HTC One M9, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.