Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| 2019-09-05 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom has a global score of 80, which is slightly better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 overall score. Even though Motorola One Zoom is much newer than HTC U Ultra, it's thicker and somewhat heavier. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a little better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Motorola One Zoom also has more CPU cores (but slower).
The HTC U Ultra has a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. HTC U Ultra features more memory for applications and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola One Zoom shoots much better videos and photos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also has a much more mega pixels camera, a larger diafragm aperture and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
Motorola One Zoom features superior battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 33 percent more battery capacity.
The Motorola One Zoom is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.