Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| 2019-09-05 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom has a general score of 80, which is a little bit better than the HTC U11's 77.6 general score. The Motorola One Zoom body is newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than HTC U11. HTC U11 features just a bit better screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels number in each inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
HTC U11 has just a little better performance than Motorola One Zoom. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and 4 GB of RAM. Motorola One Zoom features a superior camera than HTC U11, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also has a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality and a much better resolution camera.
Motorola One Zoom has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than HTC U11, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 128 GB, the Motorola One Zoom also has more internal storage. Motorola One Zoom counts with longer battery duration than HTC U11, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is way more expensive than HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC U11. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Motorola One Zoom, otherwise you can save some money and buy the HTC U11, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.