Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 450.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom has a general score of 80, which is just a bit better than LG K52's general score of 76. The Motorola One Zoom design is older, just a little heavier and a bit thicker than LG K52. The LG K52 features a bit superior processor than Motorola One Zoom. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Motorola One Zoom features a little more vivid display than LG K52, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a way better quantity of pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola One Zoom captures much clearer pictures and videos than LG K52, and although they both have a 48 megapixels back facing camera and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Motorola One Zoom also has a way better video quality and a bigger camera aperture for better low-light images and video.
LG K52 counts with a better storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG K52 features a battery duration that is just as good as the battery life in Motorola One Zoom.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.