Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 450.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a general score of 85.4, which is a bit better than Motorola One Zoom's 80 overall score. The LG K92 body is newer and a bit thinner, but just a little heavier than the Motorola One Zoom. LG K92 and Motorola One Zoom have really similar displays, because although the LG K92 has a just a little lower display density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bit larger display.
The LG K92 has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG K92 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K92 has a little faster processing unit than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG K92 also has more RAM.
The Motorola One Zoom and the LG K92 both feature quite similar battery performance. The LG K92 counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have a same size sensor, the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the LG K92 also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
The LG K92 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.