Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 450.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is slightly better than the LG Q70, getting a overall score of 80 against 77.9. Although the Motorola One Zoom and the LG Q70 were only released 8 months apart, the Motorola One Zoom design is just a little bit thicker but just a little bit lighter. The LG Q70 has a CPU that is very similar to the processor in Motorola One Zoom, they have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Motorola One Zoom and the LG Q70 have similar screens, and although the LG Q70 has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2310 and a quite inferior number of pixels per inch of screen, they both have a same size screen. The LG Q70 has a better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG Q70's battery performance is very similar to the battery duration in Motorola One Zoom. The Motorola One Zoom features just a bit better camera than LG Q70, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Zoom also has a way more mega-pixels camera in the back, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and video and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it costs more than LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Q70. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy LG Q70, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.