Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Holographic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom has a score of 80, which is a bit better than LG Stylo 6's 76.7 overall score. Motorola One Zoom's construction is lighter but just a little bit thicker than LG Stylo 6, and they were released with only 9 months difference. LG Stylo 6 features a bit sharper screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a little bit larger display.
The LG Stylo 6 features a bit faster processing unit than Motorola One Zoom. Both have 8 CPU cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. The LG Stylo 6 has a greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola One Zoom and LG Stylo 6 both count with incredibly similar battery durations. Motorola One Zoom captures greater pictures and videos than LG Stylo 6, because it has a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution, a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way higher video definition and a larger aperture to capture better images in poorly lited situations.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG Stylo 6. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get LG Stylo 6, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.