Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2019-09-05 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Zoom's 80 overall score. The LG V35 ThinQ is an older cellphone than the Motorola One Zoom, but it's somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better looking display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a better storage to install games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit superior processor than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
Motorola One Zoom counts with a superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Motorola One Zoom features longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.