Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a score of 81.2, which is slightly better than the Motorola One Zoom's global score of 80. Despite of the fact that the LG V40 ThinQ is older than the Motorola One Zoom, it's body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little sharper display than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a same size display, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and more pixels per inch of screen. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola One Zoom features a better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a much bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a camera in the back with a much better 48 MP resolution.
Motorola One Zoom counts with greater battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
LG V40 ThinQ is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.