Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is just a bit better than the Motorola One Zoom, getting an 87.1 score against 80. The LG Velvet is a thinner and a little lighter phone than the Motorola One Zoom, even when both were released only 8 months apart. The LG Velvet features a bit better CPU than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has more RAM memory.
LG Velvet has a bit better display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2460px resolution and a little bit bigger screen. LG Velvet features much more memory to install applications and games than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG Velvet also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same resolution camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same back camera sensor size and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Zoom also has a bigger camera aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited situations.
LG Velvet has just a bit better battery performance than Motorola One Zoom, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
LG Velvet is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.